"من فقط آدم بدی هستم که برای نابود کردن آدم‌های بدتر پول می‌گیرم"

This quote cuts right to the chase, doesn’t it? It’s straightforward and raw, boiling down to the idea that some people do bad things, but they target even worse individuals. The person speaking doesn't sugarcoat their job or role; they acknowledge their own negative actions but justify them by the nature of their targets.

Imagine a mercenary or a bounty hunter—someone who operates outside the confines of typical societal norms but aims their efforts at those who are more dangerous or malevolent. This is essentially what the quote is getting at: justifying questionable actions by the nature of the target.

Historically, we can look at the context of antiheroes in literature and media. Think about characters like Deadpool from comics or movies. Deadpool isn't your traditional superhero—he's crass, violent, and morally ambiguous. But his targets? They're usually people who are much worse. Deadpool might be considered "bad" by standard definitions, but compared to his adversaries, he's almost a necessary evil.

Take a real-life example: bounty hunters. They might use tactics that are aggressive, maybe even legally gray, but their targets are often criminals who have jumped bail, running from the law. These bounty hunters aren’t exactly the good guys—they're in it for the money—but they’re pursuing people who are arguably a bigger threat to society.

So, how can we use this piece of wisdom in our own lives? Well, it’s about understanding moral complexity. Not everything is black and white. Sometimes, you have to operate in the gray areas. If you find yourself in a situation where you have to do something that feels morally ambiguous, ask yourself: What’s the greater good? Are you targeting a bigger problem or threat? This doesn't mean you should go around justifying bad behavior, but rather understand that context matters.

Let’s bring this down to a relatable scenario. Picture you're working in a competitive corporate environment. You’ve been asked to take on a task that might seem cutthroat, like aggressively pursuing a deal that could put a smaller business in a tight spot. You’re not thrilled about it—it feels a bit 'bad guy-ish.' But then, you find out that this smaller business is actually engaging in unethical practices, treating its employees terribly, and cutting corners that endanger consumers. Suddenly, your aggressive business move feels more justified. You’re still doing something tough, maybe even ruthless, but it’s against a backdrop of addressing a greater wrong.

Talking to a friend about it over coffee, you might say, “Yeah, I feel like a bit of a jerk going after this deal so hard, but did you know what they’re doing behind the scenes? It’s pretty awful. I guess it’s like that saying—sometimes you gotta be the bad guy to take down worse guys.”

In the end, it’s about the balance and the bigger picture. None of us exist in a vacuum, and sometimes, your actions are defined not just by what you do, but by whom you do them to. Keep that in mind the next time you’re faced with a morally gray decision. It might just give you the clarity you need to act.